Judge Thomas G., JR. Crossan
How is this compared?
This judge: 6 of 937 (0.6 %) got relief (includes their cases in other courts). The other judges in the court: 260 of 12,247 (2.1 %). We say "more" or "less" only when the difference is statistically clear (two-proportion test, 95%); otherwise "similar".
Decisions over 12 months
In plain words
Out of every 100 cases this judge decided, 1 got relief. Very few cases end with relief.
0 of every 100 cases were decided in absentia, that is, without the person at the hearing.
With and without an attorney, the share with relief was similar (1.8 % and 0.0 %).
Of their 937 decisions, 6 ended with relief, 100 with the case closed, 344 with voluntary departure and 487 with a removal order.
| Outcome | Decisions | % |
|---|---|---|
| Relief | 6 | 0.6 % |
| Case closed | 100 | 10.7 % |
| Voluntary departure | 344 | 36.7 % |
| Removal order | 487 | 52.0 % |
| Decided in absentia | 0 | 0.0 % |
This judge, the court and the nation
With Thomas G., JR. Crossan, the share of cases with relief is 0.6 %: lower than at the Pearsall court (2.0 %) and lower than nationwide (2.4 %).
With Thomas G., JR. Crossan, the share of removal orders is 52.0 %: higher than at the Pearsall court (50.3 %) and lower than nationwide (75.6 %).
With Thomas G., JR. Crossan, the share of cases decided in absentia is 0.0 %: similar than at the Pearsall court (0.1 %) and lower than nationwide (45.3 %).
With Thomas G., JR. Crossan, the share of people with an attorney is 36.4 %: higher than at the Pearsall court (35.4 %) and lower than nationwide (38.1 %).
Cases with Thomas G., JR. Crossan take longer than at the Pearsall court: a median of 490 days versus 99.
Compared with other judges
- Ranked 11 of 15 for relief among the judges of their court (1 = most relief).
- Ranked 5 of 15 for cases decided in absentia (1 = most in absentia).
- Ranked 13 of 15 for speed (1 = fastest).
- Grants relief more often than 22 of every 100 judges nationwide (among 850 judges with 50 or more decisions).
Decisions per month (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026)
The busiest month was Jul 2026 (151 decisions) and the quietest Nov 2025 (35).
| Month | Decisions | Relief | In absentia | Vs. prior month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 93 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Oct 2025 | 86 | 0 | 0 | down |
| Nov 2025 | 35 | 0 | 0 | down |
| Dec 2025 | 46 | 1 | 0 | up |
| Jan 2026 | 35 | 2 | 0 | down |
| Feb 2026 | 49 | 0 | 0 | up |
| Mar 2026 | 70 | 0 | 0 | up |
| Apr 2026 | 102 | 2 | 0 | up |
| May 2026 | 114 | 1 | 0 | up |
| Jun 2026 | 89 | 0 | 0 | down |
| Jul 2026 | 151 | 0 | 0 | up |
| Aug 2026 | 67 | 0 | 0 | down |
Months with fewer than 5 decisions are dotted: with so few cases, that month's percentage says little.
By nationality
The nationality with the most decisions before Thomas G., JR. Crossan is Mexico (276), followed by Honduras, Venezuela, Cuba and Guatemala. The highest share with relief was for people from Cuba (1.2 %).
| Country of origin | Decisions | Relief | In absentia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 276 | 0.4 % | 0.0 % |
| Honduras | 145 | 0.7 % | 0.0 % |
| Venezuela | 145 | 0.0 % | 0.0 % |
| Cuba | 81 | 1.2 % | 0.0 % |
| Guatemala | 58 | 0.0 % | 0.0 % |
Only countries with 25 or more decisions with this judge; cases without a recorded nationality are not included.
With and without an attorney
| Decisions | Relief | |
|---|---|---|
| With an attorney | 341 | 1.8 % |
| Without an attorney | 596 | 0.0 % |
Where this judge decides
- Pearsall Immigration Court: 793 decisions (84.6 %)
- San Antonio Immigration Court: 144 decisions (15.4 %)