Judge Tiesha Peal
How is this compared?
This judge: 53 of 2,927 (1.8 %) got relief. The other judges in the court: 1,687 of 36,173 (4.7 %). We say "more" or "less" only when the difference is statistically clear (two-proportion test, 95%); otherwise "similar".
Decisions over 12 months
In plain words
Out of every 100 cases this judge decided, 2 got relief. Very few cases end with relief.
6 of every 10 cases were decided in absentia, without the person at the hearing. Going to your hearing is the most important thing you can do.
With and without an attorney, the share with relief was similar (5.0 % and 0.0 %).
Of their 2,927 decisions, 53 ended with relief, 64 with the case closed, 48 with voluntary departure and 2,762 with a removal order.
| Outcome | Decisions | % |
|---|---|---|
| Relief | 53 | 1.8 % |
| Case closed | 64 | 2.2 % |
| Voluntary departure | 48 | 1.6 % |
| Removal order | 2,762 | 94.4 % |
| Decided in absentia | 1,865 | 63.7 % |
This judge, the court and the nation
With Tiesha Peal, the share of cases with relief is 1.8 %: lower than at the New York court (4.5 %) and lower than nationwide (2.4 %).
With Tiesha Peal, the share of removal orders is 94.4 %: higher than at the New York court (84.5 %) and higher than nationwide (75.6 %).
With Tiesha Peal, the share of cases decided in absentia is 63.7 %: higher than at the New York court (52.4 %) and higher than nationwide (45.3 %).
With Tiesha Peal, the share of people with an attorney is 36.5 %: lower than at the New York court (44.6 %) and lower than nationwide (38.1 %).
Cases with Tiesha Peal take less time than at the New York court: a median of 859 days versus 917.
Compared with other judges
- Ranked 35 of 44 for relief among the judges of their court (1 = most relief).
- Ranked 12 of 44 for cases decided in absentia (1 = most in absentia).
- Ranked 17 of 44 for speed (1 = fastest).
- Grants relief more often than 47 of every 100 judges nationwide (among 850 judges with 50 or more decisions).
Decisions per month (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026)
The busiest month was Aug 2026 (484 decisions) and the quietest Nov 2025 (119).
| Month | Decisions | Relief | In absentia | Vs. prior month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 201 | 8 | 166 | — |
| Oct 2025 | 147 | 11 | 110 | down |
| Nov 2025 | 119 | 3 | 82 | down |
| Dec 2025 | 138 | 7 | 77 | up |
| Jan 2026 | 183 | 1 | 87 | up |
| Feb 2026 | 132 | 2 | 89 | down |
| Mar 2026 | 219 | 1 | 96 | up |
| Apr 2026 | 223 | 4 | 106 | up |
| May 2026 | 224 | 1 | 62 | up |
| Jun 2026 | 401 | 5 | 321 | up |
| Jul 2026 | 456 | 2 | 350 | up |
| Aug 2026 | 484 | 8 | 319 | up |
Months with fewer than 5 decisions are dotted: with so few cases, that month's percentage says little.
By nationality
The nationality with the most decisions before Tiesha Peal is Ecuador (843), followed by Venezuela, Colombia, India and China. The highest share with relief was for people from China (6.8 %).
| Country of origin | Decisions | Relief | In absentia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 843 | 0.2 % | 67.6 % |
| Venezuela | 401 | 0.0 % | 74.6 % |
| Colombia | 285 | 0.4 % | 74.7 % |
| India | 157 | 0.6 % | 21.7 % |
| China | 148 | 6.8 % | 43.9 % |
Only countries with 25 or more decisions with this judge; cases without a recorded nationality are not included.
With and without an attorney
| Decisions | Relief | |
|---|---|---|
| With an attorney | 1,069 | 5.0 % |
| Without an attorney | 1,858 | 0.0 % |
Where this judge decides
- New York - Federal Plaza Immigration Court: 2,927 decisions (100.0 %)