Judge Elizabeth Treacy
How is this compared?
This judge: 87 of 1,768 (4.9 %) got relief. The other judges in the court: 1,082 of 44,195 (2.5 %). We say "more" or "less" only when the difference is statistically clear (two-proportion test, 95%); otherwise "similar".
Decisions over 12 months
In plain words
Out of every 100 cases this judge decided, 5 got relief. The vast majority end without relief.
7 of every 10 cases were decided in absentia, without the person at the hearing. Going to your hearing is the most important thing you can do.
With an attorney, 20 of every 100 got relief; without one, 0 of every 100 (19.7 % and 0.4 %).
Of their 1,768 decisions, 87 ended with relief, 118 with the case closed, 50 with voluntary departure and 1,513 with a removal order.
| Outcome | Decisions | % |
|---|---|---|
| Relief | 87 | 4.9 % |
| Case closed | 118 | 6.7 % |
| Voluntary departure | 50 | 2.8 % |
| Removal order | 1,513 | 85.6 % |
| Decided in absentia | 1,301 | 73.6 % |
This judge, the court and the nation
With Elizabeth Treacy, the share of cases with relief is 4.9 %: higher than at the Chicago court (2.5 %) and higher than nationwide (2.4 %).
With Elizabeth Treacy, the share of removal orders is 85.6 %: lower than at the Chicago court (88.0 %) and higher than nationwide (75.6 %).
With Elizabeth Treacy, the share of cases decided in absentia is 73.6 %: higher than at the Chicago court (69.0 %) and higher than nationwide (45.3 %).
With Elizabeth Treacy, the share of people with an attorney is 23.3 %: similar than at the Chicago court (23.8 %) and lower than nationwide (38.1 %).
Cases with Elizabeth Treacy take less time than at the Chicago court: a median of 702 days versus 873.
Compared with other judges
- Ranked 7 of 27 for relief among the judges of their court (1 = most relief).
- Ranked 11 of 27 for cases decided in absentia (1 = most in absentia).
- Ranked 6 of 27 for speed (1 = fastest).
- Grants relief more often than 77 of every 100 judges nationwide (among 850 judges with 50 or more decisions).
Decisions per month (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026)
The busiest month was Mar 2026 (264 decisions) and the quietest Aug 2026 (0).
| Month | Decisions | Relief | In absentia | Vs. prior month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 191 | 11 | 146 | — |
| Oct 2025 | 166 | 12 | 127 | down |
| Nov 2025 | 101 | 12 | 70 | down |
| Dec 2025 | 155 | 14 | 107 | up |
| Jan 2026 | 173 | 0 | 154 | up |
| Feb 2026 | 156 | 13 | 108 | down |
| Mar 2026 | 264 | 7 | 192 | up |
| Apr 2026 | 180 | 2 | 103 | down |
| May 2026 | 163 | 11 | 96 | down |
| Jun 2026 | 218 | 5 | 198 | up |
| Jul 2026 | 1 | 0 | 0 | down |
| Aug 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | down |
Months with fewer than 5 decisions are dotted: with so few cases, that month's percentage says little.
By nationality
The nationality with the most decisions before Elizabeth Treacy is Mexico (419), followed by Venezuela, Nicaragua, Colombia and Ecuador. The highest share with relief was for people from Venezuela (9.9 %).
| Country of origin | Decisions | Relief | In absentia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 419 | 0.7 % | 83.5 % |
| Venezuela | 312 | 9.9 % | 76.0 % |
| Nicaragua | 296 | 0.3 % | 89.9 % |
| Colombia | 169 | 3.0 % | 65.1 % |
| Ecuador | 134 | 0.8 % | 67.9 % |
Only countries with 25 or more decisions with this judge; cases without a recorded nationality are not included.
With and without an attorney
| Decisions | Relief | |
|---|---|---|
| With an attorney | 412 | 19.7 % |
| Without an attorney | 1,356 | 0.4 % |
Where this judge decides
- Chicago Immigration Court: 1,768 decisions (100.0 %)