Judge Emily Farrar-Crockett
How is this compared?
This judge: 68 of 871 (7.8 %) got relief (includes their cases in other courts). The other judges in the court: 1,033 of 16,286 (6.3 %). We say "more" or "less" only when the difference is statistically clear (two-proportion test, 95%); otherwise "similar".
Decisions over 12 months
In plain words
Out of every 100 cases this judge decided, 8 got relief. Even so, most end without relief.
3 of every 10 cases were decided in absentia, without the person at the hearing. Going to your hearing is the most important thing you can do.
With an attorney, 11 of every 100 got relief; without one, 3 of every 100 (11.3 % and 2.6 %).
Of their 871 decisions, 68 ended with relief, 105 with the case closed, 105 with voluntary departure and 593 with a removal order.
| Outcome | Decisions | % |
|---|---|---|
| Relief | 68 | 7.8 % |
| Case closed | 105 | 12.1 % |
| Voluntary departure | 105 | 12.1 % |
| Removal order | 593 | 68.1 % |
| Decided in absentia | 289 | 33.2 % |
This judge, the court and the nation
With Emily Farrar-Crockett, the share of cases with relief is 7.8 %: higher than at the Annandale court (6.4 %) and higher than nationwide (2.4 %).
With Emily Farrar-Crockett, the share of removal orders is 68.1 %: lower than at the Annandale court (72.1 %) and lower than nationwide (75.6 %).
With Emily Farrar-Crockett, the share of cases decided in absentia is 33.2 %: higher than at the Annandale court (26.6 %) and lower than nationwide (45.3 %).
With Emily Farrar-Crockett, the share of people with an attorney is 60.2 %: lower than at the Annandale court (64.3 %) and higher than nationwide (38.1 %).
Cases with Emily Farrar-Crockett take less time than at the Annandale court: a median of 633 days versus 719.
Compared with other judges
- Ranked 7 of 24 for relief among the judges of their court (1 = most relief).
- Ranked 11 of 24 for cases decided in absentia (1 = most in absentia).
- Ranked 10 of 24 for speed (1 = fastest).
- Grants relief more often than 90 of every 100 judges nationwide (among 850 judges with 50 or more decisions).
Decisions per month (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026)
The busiest month was Mar 2026 (98 decisions) and the quietest Dec 2025 (42).
| Month | Decisions | Relief | In absentia | Vs. prior month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 46 | 3 | 17 | — |
| Oct 2025 | 60 | 4 | 17 | up |
| Nov 2025 | 59 | 4 | 25 | down |
| Dec 2025 | 42 | 8 | 8 | down |
| Jan 2026 | 86 | 3 | 27 | up |
| Feb 2026 | 90 | 7 | 26 | up |
| Mar 2026 | 98 | 4 | 39 | up |
| Apr 2026 | 64 | 6 | 24 | down |
| May 2026 | 73 | 3 | 26 | up |
| Jun 2026 | 93 | 12 | 29 | up |
| Jul 2026 | 64 | 3 | 29 | down |
| Aug 2026 | 96 | 11 | 22 | up |
Months with fewer than 5 decisions are dotted: with so few cases, that month's percentage says little.
By nationality
The nationality with the most decisions before Emily Farrar-Crockett is Bolivia (168), followed by Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador and Peru. The highest share with relief was for people from Peru (14.3 %).
| Country of origin | Decisions | Relief | In absentia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolivia | 168 | 0.6 % | 26.8 % |
| Honduras | 116 | 4.3 % | 45.7 % |
| Guatemala | 96 | 2.1 % | 42.7 % |
| El Salvador | 93 | 6.5 % | 29.0 % |
| Peru | 70 | 14.3 % | 12.9 % |
Only countries with 25 or more decisions with this judge; cases without a recorded nationality are not included.
With and without an attorney
| Decisions | Relief | |
|---|---|---|
| With an attorney | 524 | 11.3 % |
| Without an attorney | 347 | 2.6 % |
Where this judge decides
- Annandale Immigration Court: 836 decisions (96.0 %)
- Pearsall Immigration Court: 34 decisions (3.9 %)